Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Think. Check. Submit.
Think. Check. Submit. provides a easy-to-use checklist that researchers can refer to when they are investigating whether a journal can be trusted.
Predatory Publishers PPT
Presentation about Open Access and Predatory Publishers
Open Access and Predatory Publishers
This presentation discusses: what Open Access is and why it is important, the publishing process, what predatory publishers are and how to avoid them, how to protect rights to your work, and self-archiving in Open Access repositories
“Predatory open-access publishers are those that unprofessionally exploit the gold open-access model for their own profit. That is to say, they operate as scholarly vanity presses and publish articles in exchange for the author fee. They are characterized by various levels of deception and lack of transparency in their operations.” - Jeffrey Beall, On Predatory Publishers, Chronicle of Higher Education.
With the explosion of online publishing and the increasing use of the author pay business model, predatory publishers are becoming more common. When you are evaluating a journal to determine if you article is a good fit for the publication, don’t forget to spend some time evaluating the publisher. Similarly, if you are invited to submit to a journal or to become an editorial board member, be sure to critically evaluate the publisher’s legitimacy.
How to Avoid Predatory Publishers
First see if the journal is listed in DOAJ. This isn't a guarantee that the OA journal is not predatory but it is a good indicator. You can also check to see if the publisher is a member of COPE or OASPA.
Analyze the journal to look for any predatory publisher indicators such as:
- Receiving an unsolicited email, little or no contact info given,
- Grammar errors in the text, false or misleading metrics given,
- Scope of journal is extremely broad or inappropriate,
- Promised turnaround time for peer review is very short,
- Information about fees or Author Processing Charges is not clearly laid out
Collections & Acquisitions Librarian
Drop by the Research Help Desk today!
Have a question? We are available at (250) 960-6475
Text a Librarian
Have a research questions? Text us! (250) 999-0478